Derek is Ayn’s father. He has lived for and served Ayn for
these past years as her primary caregiver. That may appear somewhat unusual
within the customary context of family structures yet it has most definitely
been in Ayn’s best interests. Derek receives some funding for this parenting
responsibility since he has two children with autism. His undeniable record
provides evidence not of neglect but rather of devotion. An autistic child of
any age often presents challenges to parents that other children no longer manifest
to fortunate parents. It is regrettable when teachers, social workers and other
observers are not cognizant of the complexities and form conclusions about the
quality of the parental care being provided. That’s how this sordid story
started. Uninformed people with unfettered authority making unnecessary choices
leading to yet another illustration of meddling incompetence. Meddling
incompetence might also be termed intrusive stupidity.
Now well over one half year has passed since Ayn was removed from
Derek’s custody and placed first in hospital care and heavily medicated,
drugged, controlled. Derek knew how to care for Ayn. If someone does not know
how to care for her, then control her. That appears to be the early logic,
although professionals will maintain that this early initiative was a
responsible effort to find a balanced medical prescription to assist Ayn. Now
for many months it must be assumed that Ayn has been living with dependable
foster parents. What choice is there? And then came that image of Ayn with what
appears to many viewers to be the traces of a bruised eye. We have all seen a
black eye and we can recognize the changing color tones, from the darker
blue/black of a broken blood vessel to the green as the injury grows older and
healing is occurring. It is something and yet it may be nothing but that’s the
point here. Why not candidly explain to Derek and Amie what accounts for this
appearance? If what appears as a black eye happened during Derek’s watch, a
school employee or someone else would be expected to pass the word along.
So when the Ministry rebuffs parental inquiries about
something like this, what recourse is there? Apparently none. Derek has even
appealed to the office of the Representative of Children and Youth which has
promised to inquire yet acknowledges it has limited facility to become
involved. Now time has passed and this matter may have already been resolved or
lost focus or gravity. It nevertheless is symptomatic of the incapacity of
parents to obtain suitable interaction, disclosure, mediation or anything else
that reduces the torture of not knowing what is happening with one’s own child.
Parents of children removed by the MCFD should have full access to all documents and communications related to their child(ren) in MCFD's possession, electronic data included, in a timely and uncensored manner. All foster care and group home facilities should be monitored by close-circuit cameras and all data stored and preserved from "accidental erasing". MCFD should be accountable to the degree at least equal to the level of supervision Canadian police forces are subjected to.
ReplyDelete