Thursday, December 15, 2011


Listen! We all understand life and business. Sometime employees are reassigned and replaced. Sometimes personal life events require time off. So in one sense it is not surprising to learn that the Ministry social worker to whom the Ayn Van Dyk case was allocated, is off the case and a different social worker has now got the file. Of course he or she doesn’t merely have Ayn’s case with which to become familiar, but several others, perhaps many more cases. That sounds daunting. It also generates concern for parents that the resolution of their cases will be unsettled and delayed. There is apprehension that the mediation already accomplished will be misunderstood, forgotten or dismissed. That is certainly some of the unease with which Derek Hoare has been left after recent phone calls.

On Tuesday Derek said, “Well I just got off the phone with the new SW for the first time.... interesting to say the least. They would not comment on the length of absence to be expected. We seem to be looking at a very steep learning curve ahead for this worker. They are going to read the file, but as of yet seem largely unaware of where we are at in our dialog.”

He continued, “I was very forthright with the worker.... can't even think of how to summarize what's racing through my mind. This is pretty disconcerting, because the worker seemed to have very little understanding of my case and was not simply handed my case to catch up on but all of them... I cannot imagine the magnitude of the task which lies before them. But I for one am not here to redo everything I have done so far, I expect MCFD to honour our talks thus far. I pressed for quick contact but it did not seem reciprocated. I think perhaps I should go up higher to someone who has a better working knowledge of this file. Unbelievable."

Now you must understand that his daughter Ayn has been in Ministry care (foster home) for six months. The earlier case worker had agreed that Derek should prepare and submit a plan of care for Ayn which the Ministry would consider as essential to returning her to him. He worked for many days to prepare a thorough and convincing proposal and he submitted this with satisfaction and confidence not long ago. Derek says, “they (case worker) did not even know my proposal had been submitted. and knew nothing about my proposals to overcome our visitation sticking point.”  The latter comment refers to Derek’s adamant decision not to visit Ayn, despite the tear on his own heart. He has passionately articulated in other documents why the trust in his autistic daughter’s heart would be shattered irreparably if he showed up and then left."

Some supporters, disenchanted with the practices of the Ministry of Children and Family Development, have alleged that this personnel change is a postponement scheme to which Derek responds.  “I do not think it is a stalling tactic, I think that the other worker is gone, for whatever reason, and this is the worker tasked with covering all their files. But it does not appear to be isolated to me, however in the meantime all those files are families, families right before Christmas, who had plans and expectations, and now this worker has been given a task which is bordering on impossible: to learn, meet, understand and exercise judgement on those families. What possible sort of timeframe is it that they will need just to get caught up let alone to intelligently proceed. Ayn should be home NOW, this is not the time for them to do this... return her and then play catch-up.

“And once again they put me in a situation where I cannot fault this individual worker (yet), but this entire process is indescribable, the strongest of terms are necessary. "Incompetent" is not a good word, for I think even the most competent of people would be unable to adequately protect children while operating under a policy framework such as this. "Evil" is not right either, because I believe the above would apply to the most moral worker as well. And the word "Authoritarian" really does not go far enough to describe the connotation which should be placed. One thing is for sure this is a nightmare. And the only way this could not be perceived as "Psychological Warfare" is if MCFD has no understanding whatsoever of Psychology. Tortuous.

You can hear Derek’s agony, his helplessness. Derek concluded his comments on this occasion with one further exasperated gasp.Time to research a whole new worker... let's hope they are as diligent as I. Then they will see a how good I am for Ayn.

I would underscore, in Ayn's best interest, her father Derek Hoare is good for her and she will thrive most effectively in the nurture of his home and her family, her brothers. What can a Ministry of social workers possibly be thinking their mandate is when they remove a child like this from the love and comfort of her own family? Even if there is some value in a brief intervention for assessment or observation to permit lengthy delay, no rather to subject a child to prolonged deprivation has violated basic human rights and expectation.

1 comment:

  1. The sad part is that the new social worker will never honor what the previous social worker(s) have said they'd do. The first one was probably just an intake worker, the second one is the longer term care worker. The only thing I can recommend when dealing with them is to get out a device and record everything that is said. They run from being recorded because that is in a memo from 8 years ago saying they are not to be recorded.

    Why not? Do they fear being caught in lies? Do they fear that they will have to honor their obligations, especially if it is recorded? So do it. Record what they say. Don't bother telling them that you are because this is for your safety because if you do, the interview will be over. MCFD are jackals and vultures, preying on the weakest, least protected, least defended members of society and we need to defend ourselves anyway we can.

    Even though it breaks his heart and he's worried about his child's reaction, he MUST visit. they will write down everything he does and use it against him. Not visiting is ammunition to them that he does not care about his child and gives them more reason to keep her away. He must not show anger, but he must not be emotionless. You gotta understand - they live off of removing child for "perceptions." If the worker sees anger, they will write down nasty wording to make the anger seem unjustified and even dangerous to them and the child. Social workers are master manipulators.

    Lastly. Get. A. Lawyer. If MCFD comes into your life snooping around, a lawyer, a GOOD one, will stall them. Most legal aide lawyers just rubber stamp what MCFD does, but there are a few good ones out there. They rubber stamp by telling you to do what MCFD wants because that will get you your child back. That's not the lawyer you want. You want one that hates MCFD with a passion and is willing to fight for the return of your child. Janet Murphy was a good one, but I don't know if she is still practicing.

    We just went through another run in with MCFD. It took them more than 2 months to finally send a letter saying the allegations were false - without actually saying it. Anyone can call for any reason, especially if you piss someone off and they want to cause retributions. Schoolyard bullies are now using the mandated reporter system to cause the entire family grief, not just target the child. All they need to do is go to a teacher, a mandated reporter, and say that there's something wrong with "Adam" or "Eve" and the entire system starts to swing into action. Teachers are supposed to report to the parents first, not MCFD.

    I don't see Ayn coming home anytime soon. There's too many roadblocks and landmines from MCFD already in place. Write the minister, and the critic. The NDP love hearing stories like this one.


I encourage your comments using this filter.
1. Write politely with a sincere statement, valid question, justifiable comment.
2. Engage with the blog post or a previous comment whether you agree or disagree.
3. Avoid hate, profanity, name calling, character attack, slander and threats, particularly when using specific names.
4. Do not advertise