Velvet Martin (Samantha’s mom) |
Samantha Martin |
Samantha Lauren Martin June 4, 1993 - December 3, 2006
With a song by Avril Lavigne here is an informative video tribute that celebrates both the importance of Life and also the loving memory of this young girl named Samantha Lauren Martin. It describes her brief life and the objective of her natural parents who missed having her in their home for most of her life. This article explains the reasons for that. Her mother has sought a Fatality Inquiry as well as personal closure. Samantha's death inspired Samantha's Law.
(this is an archived file from a Toronto Sun article from 2011)
Velvet Martin is Samantha’s mother. On Jan. 17, 2011 she finally obtained 'a Fatality Inquiry' into the death of her severely disabled 13-year-old daughter Samantha who died unexpectedly. It is happening this morning. (Samantha Martin Public Fatality Inquiry / Court reconvenes today, Friday, March 18th at 9:30 am. Edmonton Provincial Court, Room 449, Law Courts, 1A Sir Winston Churchill Square, Edmonton, AB T5J 0R2)
You will find her interesting and
heart-rending story at various internet sites. Her death in Dec. 2006, of
cardiac arrest, was not while in foster care, but rather, six months after she
had moved back into her parents' home in St. Albert,
Alberta., following more than a decade in foster care. Samantha had
a rare genetic disorder called Tetrasomy 18p, which left her mentally and
physically disabled. Velvet has testified that shortly after Samantha was born
it was apparent that she was severely disabled and social workers urged the Velvet Martin to surrender her child into foster care. She signed a voluntary
"permanent
guardianship agreement" because she was persuaded that
Samantha would have free and full access to the best programs and services
which the parents could not pay for themselves if she retained custody of her.
While Velvet could have cancelled
this agreement with 10-day notice, she was convinced that Samantha would not
then receive all that she needed. She lived for almost a decade in a foster home
that specialized in children with disabilities not far from St. Albert. There was a reorganization
of children's services in 2005 and their file was transferred to
another office, from which the Martins were told that the permanent guardian
agreement was no longer in effect, that it had been abolished. However, the
full truth about their status of guardianship was not revealed until Samantha
was close to death in hospital. No one had ever told them or they could have
had Samantha home much sooner.
When finally she returned to her
parental home it was with high hopes that she could live a happy and normal
life and that her parents could capably care for her. Her death by cardiac
arrest was not expected. However, Velvet has believed that the time
Samantha spent in foster care contributed to her death, claiming that she was
mistreated (based upon observations and substantiated with documentation.) She knows that Samantha's school had several “incident reports.” Velvet Martin believes that the foster caregivers ignored concerns from the school that Samantha was
having frequent absence seizures. Further, she learned that the foster care
facility had been investigated with respect to her daughter during her stay
there. This is part of the testimony now. Velvet Martin also alleged that Samantha's
caseworker kept records that were skeletal and inadequate. (No visits with
Samantha’s social-worker had been recorded for periods as long as 14 months.
Nor had Samantha been viewed by a physician for 3 years.) An internal review in
2007 concluded that there was no connection between her tragic death and the
foster care system. Therefore no criminal charges were laid.
Notwithstanding that, Velvet Martin
pressed for a public inquiry, which does not attribute blame but does examine
the circumstances of the death in order to determine whether there are lessons
to be learned to avert future similar tragedies. The Martins obtained this
fatality inquiry and it is expected to last three weeks.
And one more major item. Velvet
Martin has championed a new law known as Samantha's Law, a Canadian child
protection law. The life and circumstances surrounding Samantha Lauren Martin,
a child with a rare chromosome disorder, Tetrasomy 18p; and Autism led her
mother, Velvet Martin, to challenge archaic laws inhibiting the rights of
persons with disability and their families. Specifically, no loving family of a
child with developmental or medical diversity should be coerced into
relinquishing custody - whether temporary or permanent - in effort to secure
Government funding for required medical and therapeutic services! On
December 3 2009 (the same date marks the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities being tabled in the House of Commons of
Canada), Velvet Martin's persistence resulted in the establishment of "Samantha's Law." The
Amendment to the Alberta Family Support for Children with Disabilities Act,
became effective retroactive to December 2006. Section 2-3, Manual Amendments:
Policy and Procedures in Family Centred Supports and Services: "The Family
Support for Children with Disabilities Program to have separate legislation
from that of child protection services.
Tetrasomy 18p Website: Velvet Martin is
Administrator for the website, Tetrasomy 18p Canada
Founder of Samantha's Law
Spokesperson for Protecting
Canadian Children
I was advised to turn my Grandson , Dylan over to Children Services too so he could get the help that only a child in Children Services could get ! What a Big LIE ! He got into more trouble in their care than he ever did at home ! Children Services need to held accountable !
ReplyDeleteThe accountability factor is something that so many have recommended and for which they are pleading just as you are. So sorry for your experience of disappointment and frustration.
DeleteAmendments to a policy manual do not constitute a change to actual legislation or something being a "law." The petition page for "Samantha's Law" shows the page from that manual which says that the decision to support separate legislation came from "the Child Welfare Act Review in 2001-02," where "families of children with disabilities and other key stakeholders stated the unique needs of children with disabilities were not sufficiently addressed within the provisions of the Child Welfare Act." This appears to predate Samantha's unfortunate story as outlined above as the reason for her mother's search for closure after December 2006, as well as involve many other families who felt the need for separate legislation. For clarity, can someone point to what is, in fact, "Samantha's Law"? When did the achievement of the "passage" or proclamation of this "law" occur? It does not appear to be an actual law when searching the federal or provincial laws and legislations. Thank you for any direction you can provide.
ReplyDelete