Unidentified mom and child |
You already know that Paul and Zabeth Bayne are engaged with
Dr. Conrad Bowden in a Parental Capacity Assessment. I wrote a small bit about
this earlier and have been impressed with material produced by Dr. Bowden. Candidly I wonder how the Baynes will find this experience to be.
In response to my Blog No. 507 entitled Parenting
Capacity Assessment (PCA) / 507", a number of writers privately and
confidentially mentioned their interaction with Dr. Bowden. What have they said? Their opinions are
certainly of interest to the Baynes and other parents to whom MCFD Social
Workers strongly recommend Dr. Bowden. So far, not stellar reviews. I would be interested to read comments
by parents who have been favourably impressed with Dr. Bowden’s methods and
assessment results.
Writers have found that Dr. Bowden is in great demand with a very busy schedule. He is a specialist that MCFD uses regularly to do Parental Capacity Assessments (PCA), and therefore the
waiting time both for his assessment services and then for the completion of
the report is lengthy - might be six months.
One of the writers in commenting about the customary waiting
time for Dr. Bowden’s services speculated on his availability for the Baynes by
asserting that either Dr. Bowden dropped everything to take this one on, or
MCFD made arrangements to use him many months ago, both scenarios underscoring the
gravity of the Bayne case and MCFD’s determination to end it.
One writer has concluded that although unhappy with the PCA
experience, it was this parental willingness to participate in the assessment that
positively affected the MCFD decision to return the parents’ children. This writer was
pleased with Dr. Bowden during the course of the interviews that were
conducted. However, once the report was completed and when it was being
presented to the parent, this writer felt that Dr. Bowden almost changed identity.
This writer assumed that Dr. Bowden was less than objective because the writer was
offended by what were perceived as insulting comments in the report.
Another writer found it distasteful to speak to a middle
aged man about highly private and intimate matters. In fact this person felt
violated by the requirement to answer expressly personal questions but learned
that it was imperative to comply. In areas where there was hesitancy to
respond, the report reflected badly upon the parent in areas unrelated to
parenting.
Someone else said, "I am not sure if Dr. Bowden is good or bad. MCFD is very negative and will not listen to parents. So, in some ways, he is better than your
average SW. They will write their risk assessment or they will get a
psychologist to do a PCA. It is like a risk assessment. I realized
that his report is mainly a composite of what people said about me. So,
it is not so much his personal opinion, but the comments of both your
supporters and your detractors and the important thing is get those
support letters to him. And do it early. ...I am still not sure if he is good or bad."
Another writer went into the experience with Dr. Bowden feeling very positive, comfortable with the doctor and hopeful about the results. In fact this parent actually was persuaded that Dr. Bowden was opposed to MCFD but that turned out to be untrue and even a bit manipulative. This parent did not receive helpful comments within the report.
One person wrote a comment to my No. 507 post and said the following.
Another writer went into the experience with Dr. Bowden feeling very positive, comfortable with the doctor and hopeful about the results. In fact this parent actually was persuaded that Dr. Bowden was opposed to MCFD but that turned out to be untrue and even a bit manipulative. This parent did not receive helpful comments within the report.
One person wrote a comment to my No. 507 post and said the following.
One of you about whom I wrote above has written again. Do you want me to publish this recent comment?
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to hear that Dr. Bowden drove all the way from downtown Vancouver to the Surrey office specifically to participate in a one hour questioning process by the Baynes so they could gain an understanding of his methodology.
ReplyDeleteThis is a 45 minute drive each way, minimum. Keep in mind, these guys charge $250 per hour. About as much as most lawyers.
All the questioning sessions of the Baynes, Dr. Bowden drives to the Surrey office. Either the guy is not so busy at the moment or he has been apprised as to the high profile nature of this case and has been instructed to be accommodating, and will be paid appropriately.
All the PCA sessions I participated in, tests and questioning, I drove downtown for two meetings.
This case has been overblown beyond belief.
Anon at May 1, 2011 10:01 PM,
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned this case "has been overblown beyond belief." But isn't that a good thing in terms of MCFD accommodating the Baynes (inasmuch as they can be said to be accommodating)? The one thing that this case seems to drive home again and again is how important it is to not keep quiet, but to seek as much publicity as possible. If the Baynes had kept quiet, it seems most likely they would have had their 3 children taken, forever, as so many others have had their children taken.