Thursday, May 26, 2011

THE SECRET SHAME - A BIT MORE / 537

Tim Korol, "The Secret Shame" - CBC photo
Yesterday I wrote about Tim Korol’s written report called “The Secret Shame.” That was a month of May story. Korol, back in December 2010 went public with his criticisms of the Social Services of Saskatchewan for which he served as an assistant deputy minister. He had 16 years experience as a Saskatoon policeman and 10 years experience with the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission before being hired to provide advice to the province’s child welfare system with regard to family interventions and placement of children in foster homes.

What he experienced was resistance to his recommended and required changes because he was deemed an outsider. 

Please recall that two days ago I distinguished between leadership and management. I pointed out that too frequently our organizations are satisfied to promote people with on the job experience believing that they have earned the right to lead and in so doing we assume they have developed as leaders. In fact, many times they have not become leaders, merely practiced managers and their promotions to top spots will only perpetuate the system practices with which they are accustomed. The true leader on the other hand identifies shortcomings and opportunities for change and improvement and proceeds with these. 

Korol did not last long. His tenure was brief. He said in his December interview, "The bureaucracy eventually got their way and had me terminated." He claimed that the Ministry did not follow up on examples which he cited of social workers and civil servants who were not following proper policy with regard to child welfare cases. He maintains that there is no accountability for people who break policy. He is not alone in his criticisms of child welfare in the province because both the provincial auditor and the provincial Children’s Advocate have been highly critical of the social service ministry.

Listen to his assertion and tell me whether we are not saying something similar here in B.C. "The emphasis is on apprehension," Korol said of the mind-set of social workers. "And then warehousing the children. It's absolutely wrong. It's out of control." And that my readers, is what so many disenfranchised parents have been saying in British Columbia as well. Knock me down and call me Susan, they are saying this in all civilized English speaking countries. Who is listening? Are you caseworker? Are you MP? Are you Ms. McNeil? 

Korol believes that he has a moral responsibility to speak to the problems of which he is aware. In fact he desires to do more than that. He said in December that he wants to create an advocacy group to push for changes in the ministry, a group to be comprised of people with a keen interest in child welfare. He said that this organization will use good investigation, documentation, good child psychology, good child welfare, and then ultimately the courts, the power of the courts to force change in the system. He said it might be possible for some child placement issues to be taken to the courts, for judicial review.

Are there some of you who are reading this blog post today who have the passion, commitment and leadership skills to accomplish something similar here in British Columbia.

He talks with CBC's Sheila Cole here. If you have trouble accessing the video portion, try the audio immediately above.

9 comments:

  1. Well I am almost done with MCFD involvement for this time around. I learned how they try to corrupt the doctors. I had an open file from a huge amount of calls made about me in a neighbourhood I had not lived in for three years. SO, obviously it was not me or my family. I was put through my paces, many court appearances, 2 FCPCs, mediation, another mediation. I was in a hospital in a different town with my son and my baby was seized form there and my son. It was determined that my teenage son has schizophrenia and that I was a risk to him because I was in denial. ( I had never even been told his diagnosis and he was already recieving meds, which I was not opposing.)A story was made up that my baby was crawling around naked. That story came out long after they took her (it is okay in their books to make stuff up after the fact). I went through the system of visiting her under strict supervision and then less supervision, then finally unsupervised, then one day they gave hre back. I also got my son back. Yesterday his therapist and current psychiatrist said why did they diagnose him like that? Doesn't make sense as they have now spent a year with him, and he is not with that diagnosis. ANd why did MCFD take your baby? No apparent reason that they could see. SO nice to be with people who are supportive and so different from MCFD.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you understand the only reason for removal of children is to launder taxpayer money through the foster care system doctors, social workers, lawyers, judges etc. it is much easier to understand.

    What you do now is file a freedom of information request and get the total expenditure and resource involvment on your file.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The leadership is there, but well hidden. It is not the Ministers or the Deputy ministers who run the show or call the shots -- they are there only for public viewing. The people that are in charge are those teflon-coated Directors of each of the various regions. They have carte blanche in how they run their affairs. In Ontario, it is the CAS. Different structure, but the same outcomes.

    There are consistent, factory-like outcomes and consistently high rate of cash consumption on a per client basis across the Province and Canada. How this goes on without attracting attention and outrage should certainly be the focus. It is good there are a few people who come out of the system than can give us more details.

    It is said that money is the root of all evil. You will have very little disagreement from parents who have experienced child protection intervention, these agencies really are the embodiment of said evil.

    Consider: The bulk of removals are age 5 year and under (kids who can't run away and are easily co-opted), removals are characterized by lengthy stays in care, there are disproportionate aboriginal removals due to federal incentives. Very simple outcomes and well defined targets.

    The various strategies the front line social workers to justify their intervention are certainly creative, as the previous poster has indicated. The basics of each story are very similar. Removal, lengthy retention, then eventually, a return and avoidance of a formal protection hearing where it is clear evidence would not support a finding of protection.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fascinating comments above, and very informative. It would be really nice to learn more about the Freedom of Information requests and responses that victims of MCFD have filed and obtained. Is there anyone out there who can elaborate (e.g., how the FOI is done, how long it takes to get results, what sort of results are obtained, and if the mere act of requesting an FOI doesn't draw unwanted attention, or somehow cause problems for parents)?

    I really have to admire these parents who go through so much hell in order to get back what is rightfully theirs. And it is just revolting what the government and their employees do to innocent parents and especially innocent little children.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Regarding FOI requests: I've not done it myself, so I don't know how long it takes, but the information on the process is available here: http://www.gov.bc.ca/citz/iao/foi/process/index.html

    The form is only 2 pages, asks for very basic information, plus a narrative describing the information you are requesting. It's a pdf: http://www.gov.bc.ca/citz/iao/down/access_request_form_personal_iao0050.pdf

    I know the records get 'vetted' (e.g. names/contact info for reporters are blacked out) in Victoria before they are sent to you. I've been meaning to submit a request regarding my hubby, who was in foster care from age 11 until he aged out. I'll report back on timelines when I know how long it takes :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ron,

    How do you search this GPS blog?

    I only see the following on the left column of your blog, but there is no entry box, it just says Loading... :

    SEARCH THIS BLOG Loading...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello reader May 30 5:53 AM

    Your message suggests that your system or the Blogger site is processing your request. As far as I know there is no functional issue. I tried the search feature and it worked immediately. Please try again. Perhaps before you do that, if you can reload that GPS tab, the blog will become fully functional. Sometimes glitches occur upon loading any site. A reload takes care of it. Let me know if your concern continues or if it corrects.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ron,

    Thank you for your detailed suggestions.
    Trying again and again, harder and harder did not work.
    Turns out the problem is with the system. (This is beginning to reverberate with the "Child Protection Services vs Families" problem isn't it?)

    Employed another browser system compatible with the blogspot site search features, and it worked like a charm.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you very much Alison for the information about FOI (freedom of information) requests.

    You wrote:

    "I know the records get 'vetted' (e.g. names/contact info for reporters are blacked out) in Victoria before they are sent to you."

    Does the "you" (the last word in your sentence above) refer to social workers or MCFD employees who provide the FOI info? What I am wondering, in particular, is if a parent does an FOI request does that attract (unwanted) attention from MCFD, or does the information come from another department who work with MCFD (and if the latter is the case, does this still not alert, or remind, MCFD that there is a parent out there making FOI inquiries, and maybe we (MCFD) should discourage them from doing this by, say, doing some more investigating into their parental abilities?


    To anyone who has any info on this, it would be very interesting to know what happens when a parent makes an FOI request to MCFD.

    ReplyDelete

I encourage your comments using this filter.
1. Write politely with a sincere statement, valid question, justifiable comment.
2. Engage with the blog post or a previous comment whether you agree or disagree.
3. Avoid hate, profanity, name calling, character attack, slander and threats, particularly when using specific names.
4. Do not advertise