For two year old Bridger who already moves with dexterity over the face of his iPad, cyberjustice will be automatic in both acceptance and practice when and if he is a lawyer or a judge. It is our present older generations that struggle with the concept.
Clearly there is socio-cultural and psycho-scientific
unwillingness to change in most areas of our lives. This has been
particularly true in a realm where tradition, custom, predictable
patterns and dependence on regulations, symbolize the justice system.
These hallmarks may not be effectively serving the justice system any
longer. People have difficulty accessing justice in our system
because of the excessive legal costs and the bottle-necked courts, so
necessity is compelling the judicial community to utilize technology.
The accelerating potential of technology will transform the
courtroom. Certainly it must be a carefully studied modification
because there are substantial traditions in law. Can these traditions
be adapted to the digital age? The research must convincingly
determine how our new technologies influence the trial process.