tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post6999390495011946511..comments2024-02-24T16:30:33.798-08:00Comments on GPS: TAKING AYN WAS WRONG / 606Ronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07353695791008715393noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-58222701355951470882011-08-27T12:04:24.787-07:002011-08-27T12:04:24.787-07:00Yes, please keep this blog open, even if commentin...Yes, please keep this blog open, even if commenting is closed. There is so much useful info here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-14337039830630178632011-08-27T00:44:44.883-07:002011-08-27T00:44:44.883-07:00Dear Ron,
I was traumatized by MCFD starting in No...Dear Ron,<br />I was traumatized by MCFD starting in November of 2009 shortly after I was blissfully happy with my newborn baby and my 5 other children. I looked everywhere for help and I saw no one who knew what to do. I went from lawyer to lawyer. No one who could fight MCFD. I found your blog and I learned so much and I felt that if such great parents as Paul and Zabeth could be troubled in this way, then it is something wrong with the system. I did get my baby back and my file closed on August 2, 2011. I hope you still keep this up so I can at least read it over before you retire it. I want to reread the entire blog. It has been so helpful.<br /><br />SIncerely,<br /><br />AnnonymousAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-18824260963058401232011-08-26T21:07:20.907-07:002011-08-26T21:07:20.907-07:00In 2007, we the taxpayers, paid this judge - C. Ga...In 2007, we the taxpayers, paid this judge - C. Gail Maltby, the one who told Zabeth she should "be happy" - $201,497.00. This is an outrage. Our money is being used to destroy good people such as Zabeth Bayne and her family. This is an outrage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-41535478630013742052011-08-26T21:00:21.625-07:002011-08-26T21:00:21.625-07:00RE: Ray Ferris' posting at August 26, 2011 2:...RE: Ray Ferris' posting at August 26, 2011 2:02 PM:<br /><br />Once again, I am sickened to read about judges that have no regard for the suffering they put parents and children through. That a judge could say such a thing to a mother (be happy with that). These judges are behave as if they are inhuman. I wonder if Judge Maltby has children, and if she does, how she would feel if she were put in the same position as Zabeth was. Would she, when admonished by a judge, just do as th judge bid, and be happy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-80226793190368977692011-08-26T16:14:17.610-07:002011-08-26T16:14:17.610-07:00How long is the Bayne's supervisory period? I ...How long is the Bayne's supervisory period? I hope you will post when it comes to an end.Leona Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06533000192386664615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-87576544453241092912011-08-26T14:02:36.404-07:002011-08-26T14:02:36.404-07:00The law says a lot of things that are ignored by t...The law says a lot of things that are ignored by the ministry director, their counsel and the judges. For instance a presentation hearing is summary and must be completed as quickly as possible. To adjourn a presentation hearing for three months is a blatant abuse of the law. The intention of the act is to get the ministry to state its case within seven days and to have a protection hearing within 45 days, so that parents can demand to test the evidence. This never happens, unless the parents do not want their children. The hearing them becomes a mere formality.<br />Derek Hoare will not get a hearing within 45 days--guaranteed. Nor will he get ten days written notice, stating the intention of the director. This will only happen if the director decides to back off and return Ayn. As soon as the court hears that the case is contested, it will be adjourned indefinitely. The first adjournment will be to fix a date to fix a date. That can take a month or two. Then there will be discussion about how many witnesses will be called and how many court days are needed. The director will probably stack the court with as many irelevant witnesses as possible and it will be decided that several hearing days will be required. The lawyers will have to co-ordinate their diaries with the court calendar. It may be a year before the sequential days can be found. If everyone agrees it can be taken a day or two here and there.<br /> There will be no evidence on interim custody allowed and the judge will rubber stamp whatever the director wants.The deputy minister will not overrule him and neither will the new provinicial director. <br /> You think I exaggerate? All this and more has happened in the Bayne case and many others. <br /> In May 2009, the Baynes tried to apply to the court to ask for extended access. Crabtree was tied up and Judge Maltby presided. She would not allow Zabeth to speak and said "You are trying to turn this into a trial. You have your trial set for next March. Be happy with that." Be happy with that!! The children had already been in care for 19 months and they were only allowed to see them for four hours a week. 2X2 hours. You must wait another 10 months to say anything to the court. You must wait for two years and three months before you can hold anyone accountable. Be happy with that!!<br /> Best interests of the children? Don't make me laugh.Ray Ferrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-15268705214202225142011-08-26T12:22:20.453-07:002011-08-26T12:22:20.453-07:00Why isn't this atrocity front page news? It r...Why isn't this atrocity front page news? It really shows you how the media is part of the problem, rather than helping to protect our civil liberties.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com