tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post4700659345012098629..comments2024-02-24T16:30:33.798-08:00Comments on GPS: For Love and For Justice / Part 133 / Zabeth and Paul BayneRonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07353695791008715393noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-55417987952363702922010-03-12T01:59:00.060-08:002010-03-12T01:59:00.060-08:00Please forgive my abruptness, I disagree with your...Please forgive my abruptness, I disagree with your remark that MCFD does not make a child removal decision lightly. This is what MCFD would like the public to believe. Reality is not quite the same.<br /><br />I have seen children removed because a red rash is misconstrued as a sign of abuse, children appeared to be unhappy in school is interpreted as abuse, parents taking innocent nude photos of their children when taking a bath is considered sexual abuse, unclean home is ground for removal, ... etc. I have also witnessed "child protection" social worker blackmailing a parent to go to court to admit abuse 3 hours after removing his children and his wife was threatened by social workers to divorce her husband if she wants her children back. Parents can be charged with kidnapping of their own children if they try taking them back without a court order after removal. Some parents and children receiving "services" from MCFD committed suicide. Most Canadians do not know these realities and find it unbelievable that a government who ardently speaks of human rights and family development will create atrocities like these.<br /><br />Since biblical time, children have been used as pawns by those in power for various reasons. In modern time, children are used to create a lucrative "child protection" industry perverted by special interests. MCFD social workers enhance their job security and a larger budget if they have more open files on their desk.<br /><br />Child removal authority has been abused by various parties, most notably estranged spouse, police, Crown prosecutors and malicious parties. This statutory authority is oppressive and redundant (as law also has other due process to separate abusive parents and vulnerable children if there is good evidence).<br /><br />The Bayne's trauma is not an isolated incident. Atrocities like this will continue as long as government has the power to remove children. This problem pertains in most English speaking nations where government has this power. This also enabled the notorious "residential school" in our past when the First Nation was oppressed by a very racist cultural assimilation policy. <br /><br />Modern "child protection" is a disguised derivative of residential school characterized by the same notion of cultural assimilation (now expressed as government dictated culture of child upbringing and standard of care). Incidentally, the First Nation remains the biggest victim (about 50% of removed children are from Native families).<br /><br />There is structural corruption in the "child protection" industry and is irreparable. State-sponsored child removal is nothing more than a scheme to transfer wealth from taxpayers to service providers, brokered by bureaucrats in MCFD, in this industry under the pretext of child protection. Of course, this is done at the expense of destroying families and ironically children.<br /><br />The Bayne's case clearly confirms the foregoing. Guess how much legal expense will be paid out of taxpayer's pocket at the end of the trial. Follow where the money goes. You will solve the puzzle to explain why MCFD does business this way.<br /><br />Child removal authority is inhumane, barbaric and has no place in a civilized society. There are ample empirical evidence confirming that it is destroying the backbone of our nation, namely families and children. It must be revoked at all costs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8060003097513753942.post-57558660898275019752010-03-11T09:27:07.814-08:002010-03-11T09:27:07.814-08:00Does anyone get the impression that MCFD has been ...Does anyone get the impression that MCFD has been given "god status"?? I remember the great fanfare when this legislation was being developed and then changed because too many children were "falling through the cracks." However, this legislation must be revised. The imbalance of power is outrageous and after reading this blog, it is easy to see that a single social worker has nearly endless power to abuse families and children.Bernicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02804868851012481592noreply@blogger.com